| Welcome to LaRouche Continued, a forum dedicated to all things Lyndon LaRouche (from the history of his political cult to present-day affairs.) |
| Is THE GRIFFIN building an alt org?; Helga, take note! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 29 2015, 08:57 AM (28,160 Views) | |
| man114 | Aug 23 2016, 05:38 AM Post #211 |
|
Asteroid Dodging Administrator
|
Frankly I am sorely disappointed in the good doctor. As pitiful of a "retraction" as if is doesn't he have the guts to stand up to the statement he made even if it is false? When you look at it it's not really a retraction if he says the assertations are factual. Basically he's just saying something like "I told you the lights were on. They're still on, I'm just going to say they're off now so I don't get in trouble for wasting electricity". He should just take it like a man and not back down at all. Hasn't Tapley learned this from LaRouche? To hell with "retractions"! LaRouche is never wrong! In a case like this LaRouche would lie on the witness stand and throw his own followers under the bus but never admit a thing. Foot soldiers are expendable and replaceable. Surely Tarpley has learned from LaRouche and weaved a complex financial trail to make tracing any donations they receive completely impossible, hasn't he? If so what does he have to worry about anyway? |
![]() |
|
| Guest | Aug 30 2016, 08:31 AM Post #212 |
|
Unregistered
|
With the press trying to find out more about Mrs. Trump's immigration status, their tax returns, and all the rest of the reasons she is ducking them, I wonder if Webster is being a little too generous to his "movement" by suggesting that Melania would even be aware of his "briefing." Even if a libel lawyer did get in touch, which would almost impress me, I think it could be to Webster's benefit to have supporters read this and say, "Oh my, well, I guess Tarpley must be a pretty serious figure if Trump's wife may have endured duress or harm over something he and his friends wrote." |
|
|
| fightapathy | Aug 31 2016, 04:08 AM Post #213 |
|
LaRouche4POTUS 2020
|
That's why I think it was a cowardly, spineless, yellow-bellied knee-jerk reaction to the libel suit against The Daily Mail, which published similar accusations. I would have loved to be in on the weekly TWSP conference call when they were whimpering about what to do! The utterly hilarious thing is, THE GRIFFIN addressed the problem of the British libel law at The Left Forum where he admitted he could not publish ANY of his books due to the fact that they were ENTIRELY innuendo and liable to be banned for libel! "And we do not want the British libel law here! No!" Herr Doktor insisted his kind of innuendo was crucial for outing the truth, which was impossible in Britain. Huh! If THE GRIFFIN was so sure of the American Libel Law, why did he cower before a suit against a British tabloid in Britain? |
![]() |
|
| Whirled Wild Web | Sep 1 2016, 01:00 AM Post #214 |
|
Shakespeare
|
Tarpo hasn't Tweeted in days after being BTFO by Melania, and now the daily briefing is hiding behind a paywall. Will we ever hear from the good doctor again? |
![]() |
|
| fightapathy | Sep 1 2016, 01:34 AM Post #215 |
|
LaRouche4POTUS 2020
|
PAY wall?! Who the F would put up cash just to hear THE GRIFFIN throw up all over Trump? I can get that for free anywhere. Maybe its Herr Doktor's mini-me of LaRouche, whereby he squeezes the more deluded members of the TWSP for every penny* they have, through in-house subscriptions like the morning briefing? Who knows... *THE GRIFFIN squeezes for pennies, not dimes, on account of the general poverty of the average TWSP activist. |
![]() |
|
| man114 | Sep 1 2016, 03:56 AM Post #216 |
|
Asteroid Dodging Administrator
|
$7.99?! :lol: Maybe Tarpley is trying to build a legal defense budget in case Melania sues him. I see this as detrimental to building support for the TWSP's fight, I think you'd want more free information available to suck in people during the elections. $7.99 though? For a few bucks more you can get a SiriusXM subscription and listen to talk radio shows all day long and hear people dump on Trump and still have some music to listen to if you get bored of it. |
![]() |
|
| xlcr4life | Sep 1 2016, 07:04 AM Post #217 |
|
Furtwangler
|
I can't see this working out too well for The Griffin. There is only so much available extra income out there to spend on non essential subscription services. The tweets are coming from the Tax Wall Street Party http://americansystem.tv/e/20160830/
This does not look like an all day network and just a podcast. Dr. Tarpley vs NetFlix? Netflix and chill vs Tarpley and shrill? No contest. |
![]() |
|
| fightapathy | Sep 1 2016, 08:55 AM Post #218 |
|
LaRouche4POTUS 2020
|
Well that's what it is: THE GRIFFIN's replaced his morning briefs with a daily one-hour podcast and put a price-tag on it, to boot! Even more hilarious, he's adopted the LaRouche method of telling good-natured but still sheepish followers to pay him in order to be L-L-L-LEADERS! Not to mention "Save the world!" I call this ploy "dead on arrival". I hope WORLD CRISSISSSS RRRRRADIO is still free... |
![]() |
|
| man114 | Sep 1 2016, 10:29 AM Post #219 |
|
Asteroid Dodging Administrator
|
At least LaRouche gives you basically everything for free even though they suggest a contribution, even the EIRs are free if you wait a couple of weeks. Your LaRouchePAC daily email is free. You don't seem to get a lot for your $7.99. I'm not sure the motive. Is it to insure if you're subscribing you really like Tarpley? Does he just need money? Is $7.99 the magic amount of money that keeps away Melania's prying eyes? Of course this is DOA, and I certainly hope they don't try charging for World Crisis Radio. |
![]() |
|
| Guest | Sep 2 2016, 10:42 AM Post #220 |
|
Unregistered
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldvi...-trump-lawsuit/ Could it be that Webster's past with LaRouche has made him quiver at the thought of being in a courtroom? I could understand this triggering some past traumatic experiences for him, even if I think he's inflating his own prominence by suggesting the Trumps are aware of him. |
|
|
| Guest | Sep 2 2016, 10:48 AM Post #221 |
|
Unregistered
|
Ha this went up almost simultaneously with XLCR's post about the lawsuit. Nothing to see here. :lol: |
|
|
| xlcr4life | Sep 2 2016, 11:02 AM Post #222 |
|
Furtwangler
|
That was a hell of a coincidence because I was just looking to go on the good Doctor's blog site to see if he is posting anything new. The Griffin is being sued for $75,000. This raises some more questions. -Any dirty tricks being done against Tarpley by a competitor? -Is this why he went to a paywall? When he first posted about Trump's wife I innocently posted here about how the cult is virtually silent about Trump while Tarpley is going full blast against him, including the reference to his blog about Trump's wife as an escort. -In the past month Webster has been writing that it is The British AND the Chinese who are in cahoots .
|
![]() |
|
| man114 | Sep 2 2016, 11:21 AM Post #223 |
|
Asteroid Dodging Administrator
|
It'll be interesting to see where this leads. His retraction of his statements is hardly a retraction at all. |
![]() |
|
| Eaglebeak | Sep 2 2016, 06:43 PM Post #224 |
|
JFK
|
Webster is in idiot. If you call someone a whore (escort), or approvingly quote someone else saying or writing it, you put yourself in the hot seat. And since Donald Trump is even more litigious than Lyndon LaRouche, and also often wins, that would be awkward for Webster. Worse yet, as you can see from the WaPo article, the lawyer the Trumps hired is the same guy who just destroyed Gawker on behalf of Hulk Hogan. Meanwhile, I have no idea about Melania Trump one way or the other (although I would assume the Donald would find out about the background of someone he planned to marry)--but I do know Webster is the most dishonest "researcher" and "historian" possible-- It was Webster who in 1975 or thereabouts wrote a New Solidarity centerfold on how wonderful Romania's Ceausescu was.... It was Webster who gave an imbecilic and profoundly dishonest speech about Latin as a fascist hoax, delivered at the Roosevelt Hotel conference in 1981--the thesis being that Latin was a hoax, an imperialist construct, and that the Romance languages were not descended from Latin, but rather from "Old Italian." Want proof? The French word for horse is cheval; Spanish is caballo; Italian is cavallo. But Latin? Ah, the Latin word for horse is equus.... QED. Except there's also caballus--Latin for ... horse. Hmmm. It was also Webster who in the mid-1990s gave remarkably stupid conference presentation on Jonathan Edwards and the Great Awakening, in which he spoke of Edwards as if he were Elmer Gantry (though Edwards was one of the most educated men in the American colonies), and declared that the American ideology -- based on dreadful Protestantism, with a special side rant on Calvin -- was ... Fatalism. (Fatalism? In the land of "Can do"?) Pretentious, pompous poseur. Putz. |
![]() |
|
| Whirled Wild Web | Sep 2 2016, 09:59 PM Post #225 |
|
Shakespeare
|
It's over for THE GRIFFIN. There's no way he's winning this one. My favorite part of all this is how the media are calling him a "blogger," LOL, instead of an historian. That has to stick in his craw, I would imagine. |
![]() |
|
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Tarp Talk · Next Topic » |







7:15 PM Jul 10